Mr. Minder informs me that it looks like he will be receiving his semi-annual bonus next month. It will probably be less than it has been previously, but he will be getting something nonetheless. We weren't expecting anything so this came as a surprise.
I have mixed feelings about this bonus. It was only a few months ago that I watched my husband struggle through laying off part of his workforce in response to the economic mess the investment banking industry was in. I can't help but wonder, could some of those jobs have been saved if bonuses were reduced/axed instead?
Don't get me wrong, I am grateful for the bonus, and Mr. Minder has worked very hard (too hard, I think) in the last 6-8 months (partly because of the corporate restructuring), and suffered more stress than usual. I have been worried about his health more in the past few months than I ever have before. He deserves the recognition - in my opinion. But is it at the expense of jobs that have been lost?
Should bonuses/incentives/pay raises be given a moratorium during tough economic times to save jobs, or should it be survival of the fittest, where those that keep their jobs get to continue to reap the rewards? What do you think?
1 hour ago
